@ 2005-07-17 - 17:31:59
I'm rather concerned to read that "President - elect" Obama, as part of his promise to head a geener administration that George W. Bush has backed the development of bioethanol technologies to provide fuel for cars. It isn't just that bioethanol is a bad technology from an environmental point of view but that in his State Of The Union address at the beginning of 2007 Bush declared his support for bioehanol as a green fuel. So Obama follows bush yet aggain; is this an example of the "change you can believe in" The Obamessiah promised the American electorate?
When Dr. David Banner starts to turn green its the bad guys who need to be afraid because the arrival of the Incredible Hulk is imminent. But when an American President announces he is turning green we should all be very afraid... Because it means the corporate conspiracy are up to something.
If you missed the news item the President - elect announced that as part of his plan to reduce America's carbon emissions by 20% he would be sponsoring an initiative to encourage the agricultural sector of the economy to get into the petroleum business by growing Corn (Maize) and Soya crops from which ethanol can be produced. The biofuel is then added to oil based petroleum thus reducing the amount of carbon put into the atmosphere.
On the face of it the idea sounds rather crackpot, so what is it really about?
The first thing to spring to mind is that it is nothing but a cynical ploy by the Democrats to buy popularity for the incoming administration. The mid-west, the corn belt, is the Republican heartland, the area that will be crucial in future elections. Support for the Grand O;ld Pasrty as it used to be affectionately know has been eroded more in the agricultural west than anywhere by rising oil prices, the credit crunch that has seen banks calling in ovrdrafts and refusing the loans farmers need for seed, new equipment and other business essentials.The mid west did not swing behind Obama in the election though, they merely stayed at home and did not vote on election day. It would only need the Republicans to get the vote out in four years time and Obama would be a one - term President. Giving a big boost to the farming communities by inventing a new market for cash crops that the USA currently have far too much capacity to produce would be a sound political move.
The second possibility is that the move is purely political and aimed at reducing America's dependency on politically unstable or possibly hostile nations such as Russia, Venezuela or Iran for the means to supply the greedy economy's oil habit.
In either case the proposal does not make economic or scientific sense.
Growing the biofuel crops is hardly a job for small, environmentally aware farming operations. The production units would have to be vast, highly mechanised farms capable of growing maize or soya by the square mile rather than by the acre. Farming would have to be intense, with only two crops to rotate and margins so tight as to remove the opportunities for leaving areas fallow, the policy would create perfect conditions for a repeat of the 1930s dustbowl social disaster.
The farms would have no option but to dump huge quantities of chemical fertilizers on the land thus polluting the water table and affecting wildlife and human population.
Then we get to the bottom line. The President says he plans to set in train a process that will eventually reduce emissions by 20%. Ethanol only reduces carbon emissions by 13% against oil; based fuels. And that is without counting the carbon released during the manufacture of fertilizer, the agricultural tasks from ploughing to transporting the harvested crop and the huge, energy hungry processing plants needed to convert the crops first to sugar and then to alcohol. Without doing the maths in fine detail it becomes clear that the great green initiative could actually result in pumping more greenhouse gases and chemical pollutants into the atmosphere per gallon of fuel in your tank.
As I said the economics do not make any sort of sense.
So really the only logic behind this bizarre announcement would appear to be that Obama for all his talk of hopes dreams and visions still has no realistic policies to tackle America's problems and no coherent plan to make America independent of the wider world in oil. It also indicates that far from having policies, Obama and the gang of sychophants and placemen he has recruited to his administration have little understanding of the true nature of the problems facing their country.
Assuming Obama manages to slither out unsoiled from the mess currently enveloping Blagojevich and the other Chicago bottom feeders who have in the past counted among the closest political associates of the "President Elect" has a very steep learning curve ahead of him, his first task being to understand he has been elected President of The United States and not President of The World.
When The White house turns green be afraid, be very afraid.
(Hover on highlighted links to reveal information about the destination)
Wind farms: Is Common Sense Breaking Out In The Warmageddonist Industry?
When somebody who has been whining about Warmageddon and the CO2 effect that is killing life on earth for twenty years suddenly starts talking not about climate change, athropogenic global warming and the need for green solutions but the arrogance and greed of those in the green lobby, it's worth paying attention
In Spite Of Evidence They Don't Work Governments Wind Farm Madness Goes On.
Many writers have exposed the junk science behind the global warming scam and just as many have exposed the fraudulent claims of those who profit from wind turnbine operating licences. Of the former all we can say is "science was ever fascism's whore", the latter of course, the wind turbine profiteers, rely on ...
Greenpeace stunt backfires. Exposes Green Energy Scam!It's always great to mock the Watermelon when they shoot themselves in the foot but this exapmple of the self interest that underpins their climate science and green energy scams is classic.
Has The Government Seen Sense On Wind Farms?
Too little too late, is the verdict of the brilliant Allister Heath on the Tories' near-non-existent recovery strategy. I'm 90 per cent with him. Like Allister, I believe that the Tory high command simply doesn't understand what radical action needs to be taken if there is to be any kind of meaningful economic recovery.
Vertical Farming: The Looniest Idea Yet For Saving The PlanetClimate Science is a strange discipline. Part trainspotting, part trekkie convention going, it combines an almost autistic obession with collcting details, a very autistic obsession with focusing on a single theme and a fantasist's capacity for self deception and a taste for mutual masturbation. The latest loonytoons idea for saving the planet involves turning skyscraper buildings into farms growing food for urban populations. Apart from increasing the cost of food by 1000% and increasing rather than reducing the carbon footprint of food production the idea is so insane noboy could ever take it seriously. Nobody that is except scientists, politicians, academics and the media.
The Futility Of Wind Farms.In some ways the Conservative / Liberal Democrat coalition has made quite a good start in government. One area they are set to fail badly however is energy. Driven by politically correct thinking the coalition are set to follow Labour down the road that goes through wind power and eventually leads nowhere. Wind turbines look fine on paper. If they generate at their optimum output for 365 days a year the contribution to energy needs looks like a viable business proposition. The problem is due to the limitations of the technology and the vagaries of the weather wind farms are doing well if they operate at a quarter of their potential output.
Climate Change Crooks And LiarsThough climate change alarmists claim that that "the science is settled" no longerr holds water the arguments rage on. If anything they are getting more heated as the climate science lobby, knocked from the moral high grounds show their true colours. But more and more evidence is showing the climate change science was never settyled and the global warming Armageddonists had built their whole case on very flimsy evidence.
Climate Science Debunked By Science Superstar Max Planck.
One of the lies most often repeated by the Climate Science lobby is that 'the science stands' i.e. that no fault was found in the scientific work of the CRU. This is both true and a lie, true in that no fault was found, a lie because the reason no fault was found is that to examine the scientific work was outside the Russell panel's terms of reference. This report features the Max Planck Institute's take on climate science and the IPCC.
Obama Deepwater Horizon
Touched With The Tar Balls
Toyota Prius Schadenfreude
Climate Change Roundup
Electric Cars - Mini Advnture In Futility
New Puma Electric Car Is Not What It Sounds Like
Electric Cars - Not Cheap At Half The Price
Climate Science Scam Exposed
Has Global Warming Stopped
Blinding Themselves With Science
Fear and panic and fossil fuels"
Too Complex For Science
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Copenhagen: The Real Agenda
Copenhagen Climate Change Conference
Government By Fear And Panic
Climate Change Deniers Deny Nothing
Climate Change Science Scam
G20 Witch Hunt
Obama's Climate Change Bill
Obama's Biofuel Folly
Reasons To Hate The Toyota Prius
Nature Does Not Negotiate
Wind Of Change
Flat Pack World
Who Needs HDTV
Small Nations Refuse To Kiss Obama's Arse
Wind Of Change
Nature Does Not Negotiate
At Last The Government Gets It - We Need Nuclear Power
Fuckwittery Of The First Order
Feel The Burn
Steve Jobs New Gadget - The Apple Of His Liver
Ten 4 Ten
Feel The Burn
Who Stole The Stars
On The Cusp